ThePakistanTime

World trade routes New orientations in a multipolar world

2026-01-26 - 23:24

NTERNATIONAL trade routes have been essential for the global economy for centuries, promoting expansion, mutual reliance, and interconnectedness. However, the 21st century has witnessed a significant shift, increasing the vulnerability of trade routes. The current global trade system relies heavily on a limited number of maritime chokepoints. Approximately 90% of international commerce is transported by ships, with a significant portion of this trade passing through the Indian Ocean, the Red Sea, and the Suez Canal. What once symbolized efficiency and connection, these routes now frequently represent instability. Among these maritime passages, the Indian Ocean stands out as a vital artery for global trade. It moves energy from the Middle East to Europe and Asia and ships manufactured goods from East Asia worldwide. Maritime analysts estimate about 80% of international trade volume travels by sea, with roughly 60% passing through the Indian Ocean region. The Bab el-Mandeb Strait, also known as the “Gate of Tears,” acts as a separator between Yemen and Djibouti/Eritrea, directing international shipping from the Indian Ocean into the Red Sea. This route handles over 3 million barrels of oil daily, along with an estimated 12-15% of global maritime trade. The Suez Canal stretches 193 km, linking Port Said on the Mediterranean with the city of Suez on the Red Sea. This sea route, the quickest link between Asia and Europe, manages about 12% of global trade and 30% of container traffic. It also accounts for 7-10% of global oil and approximately 8% of liquefied natural gas (LNG). Connecting the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, the Strait of Hormuz lies between Iran’s Musandam Peninsula and Oman. An average of 20 million barrels of oil each day passed through the strait in 2023–24, representing nearly 30% of the world’s seaborne oil trade and 20% of global petroleum liquids consumption. This waterway handles roughly 20% of global LNG trade, especially exports originating from Qatar and the UAE. Collectively, these chokepoints form a continuous Asia-Europe trade corridor. Ships traveling from East Asia to Europe transit the Malacca Strait, cross the Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea, and then choose either the Bab el-Mandeb and Suez Canal route or the alternative round-the-Cape path, finally arriving in Europe through the Mediterranean. The Suez Canal and the Red Sea now powerfully symbolize the vulnerability of trade routes. The Red Sea was declared a pressure point by Yemen’s Houthi movement targeting Israel and its allies, subsequent to the Gaza conflict. There were attacks close to the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait, a very narrow global maritime passage. The Red Sea has transformed into a militarized zone, heightening the potential for errors in judgment. Merchant ships experienced delays because of convoy systems. This region is now considered a “war-risk zone” by insurance firms. Some of the world’s most politically unstable countries share a border with the Red Sea. A civil war and fragmented governance characterize Yemen. Sudan is experiencing internal conflict and the breakdown of its state. Both Eritrea and Somalia struggle with weak governance and have militarized coastlines. Piracy, which had decreased after 2015, is now resurfacing, especially in the southern Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. These shipping lanes are no longer neutral territories. The threats expose a fundamental weakness in the current trade system: the assumption that sea lanes will remain perpetually accessible and secure. Maritime trade routes are increasingly vulnerable to asymmetric warfare, militant groups, and geopolitical conflicts. This perspective has strongly advocated for new trade routes, diverging from traditional Western maritime zones. The Polar Silk Road, connecting Asia and Europe via Arctic waters, stands out as a major new route. Once seen as remote and economically unimportant, the Arctic is undergoing rapid change because of climate change. Data shows Arctic ice has diminished by roughly 40% from its 1980 extent. The significant melting has extended the shipping season in the Arctic, especially from July to October, boosting its viability. China and Russia are now the main drivers of Arctic trade goals. The Arctic holds both economic and strategic value for Russia. Compared to the usual routes via the Indian Ocean and Suez Canal, the Northern Sea Route offers a substantial reduction in travel distance between East Asia and Europe. Lowering travel time leads to savings on fuel, reduced costs for shipping, and a decrease in geopolitical hazards. China and Russia’s Arctic collaboration mirrors larger global shifts toward a multipolar world, with new powers looking for options beyond a system controlled by one dominant force. Despite its framing as a global crisis, climate change has surprisingly become a catalyst for new trade routes. Although the Arctic ice melt is an environmental concern, it has created unprecedented economic possibilities. With seasonal ice-free conditions, commercial shipping is now feasible in formerly permanently frozen waters. This advancement, however, brings with it added difficulties. Advanced technology, specialized ice-class ships, and significant infrastructure investment are essential for Arctic shipping. Environmental worries, unclear laws, and competition for resources make the region’s future more complex. Despite facing these obstacles, the strategic motivators seem powerful enough to encourage major powers to carry on. The adoption of new trade paths suggests a significant transformation in the global economic structure. Economic priorities are being reshaped by global conflicts, leading to trade routes being recognized as crucial strategic assets for national security, beyond their commercial role. Nations that adapt, diversify, and plan ahead will prosper, while others will fall behind in this changing world. Success in future global trade hinges on mastering new routes, not controlling old ones. —The writer is Commoner from 44th Common Educationist — Founder of WHI Institute.based in Sargodha. (waqarhassancsp@gmail.com)

Share this post: